Econophysics
April 13, 2011 — April 13, 2011
Physicists think some models from statistical mechanics will explain some stuff from economics better than models from economics.
Things to discuss: Whether anything is actually happening here at all.
Mauro Gallegati, Steve Keen, Paul Ormerod. 2006. Worrying trends in Econophysics.
Our concerns are fourfold. First, a lack of awareness of work that has been done within economics itself. Second, resistance to more rigorous and robust statistical methodology. Third, the belief that universal empirical regularities can be found in many areas of economic activity. Fourth, the theoretical models which are being used to explain empirical phenomena […] are based on spurious conservation laws.
1 Incoming
- Damien Challet’s 2003 Minority Game reading list
- The Structure of Information Economy by Zhang, Zhang and others
Philip Moriarty, Will Fermi and Dirac save us? Probably not.
A paper recently appeared on the arXiv with the ever-so-intriguing title of “Attacking Covid-19 with the Ising-model and the Fermi-Dirac Distribution Function”. […] I’m a big fan of the Ising model — not least because we have extensively used a variant to simulate pattern formation in nanoparticle assemblies for many* years […] Having now read the paper, it’s a little, um, underwhelming, given the rather overstated premise of the title. That’s not to say that it’s not worth reading as an example of how modelling and simulation strategies from condensed matter physics can be translated to social and epidemiological settings.